Skip to main content

Balance: Are you giving, or taking, too much?

The equinox, when day (very nearly) equals night, seems a good time to ponder the notion of 'balance'.

Firstly, what strikes me from simple observation of the world around us is that balance is not a dull, static, flavourless state, but a dynamic, flowing, colourful process of give and take. It is like a good risotto, which is a harmony of ingredients, each with its own flavour, which, working together, produce a tasty, healthy meal.

Among the questions which, I think, we should ask ourselves from time to time - and the spring and autumn equinoxes seem naturally apt times to do so - are: Am I taking more than I need? And: Am I giving more than I can afford (not just in a financial sense, but in terms of time, energy, emotions, thought, etc)?

Take, take, take is, of course, selfish, but give, give, give can be as self-centred if done for the wrong reasons. For example, do we give out of love and caring for another person, wanting and expecting no reward? Or do we do so to ease our guilt so we can feel better about ourselves? Or to bolster our ego so we can look like the wonderful generous person we wish to be seen as, and so feel good about ourselves? Do we, for example, self-identify as 'the giver', whose feeling of self-worth derives entirely from giving, and who relies on others' grateful acceptance of our gifts for our own happiness?

Of course, there is nothing wrong with feeling good about giving, but it is important not to cling to that feeling or to give again and again simply in order to feel that way again. That is the path of the addictive giver. And behind such an addiction can often be a need to control, which possibly comes from low self-esteem. As I said earlier, can you give without reward? Or do you give in order to control the fate or feelings of another, perhaps to make them feel indebted to you? Do we give only when it suits us, or only what we think the other person needs rather than what they actually want/need? Sometimes giving, if done selfishly or carelessly or with the wrong motivation, can do more harm than good.

It is as important to ask ourselves about how much we give, and why, as it is to ask about how much we take, and why - and find the right balance, according to the time, skills and material, physical, mental and emotional resources we have available.

If we give more than we can afford, we can end up creating more unhappiness in the world, starting with our own. And if we are unhappy, it is likely that our unhappiness will spill over into the world, and on to the people around us. Give too much and everyone loses.

So, at times like the spring and autumn equinoxes, it is good to consider how we give and take, and how we can ensure that our actions respect the dynamic balance that is essential for us all to live fulfilling and harmonious lives, inside and out.

As the saying goes: we have two hands - one to give and one to receive.

Remember, to live we must breathe in as well as breathe out... accept as well as give...

Comments

  1. I found my judgement improved once I had completely rejected the "reward system" promoted by the abrahamic frameworks. If you negate these sort incentives, you tend to approach it much more holistically.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks, corvusrouge. Just to make sure I have understood you, what do you mean when you say the Abrahamic reward system?

    ReplyDelete
  3. The concepts that provide frameworks for religious activities that promote the idea that following them will lead to a "reward" (read heaven, God's right hand "man" etc) or punishment (read hell, purgatory etc). Those sort of frameworks were devised in the early mediaeval as a way of controlling peoples behaviours, carrot and stick probably an apt description. I don't practice my religion for personal gain, and surprisingly (or maybe not) it seems to me the people administering these type of reward religions never seem to be materially disadvantaged.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, it feels more authentic to engage in a spiritual practice out of love and respect for life (or for an individual expression of life-force) than to do so in the hope of reward. If I were a god I would far sooner my believers came to me out of love than fear or expectation.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When the fields are brown

There is a sense of quiet settling across the once-busy fields, now shorn of their wheat, barley and rape. The flowers in the ditches are no longer as riotous or plentiful in colour and variety and the birdsong is somewhat muted.

The cereal harvest is gathered in and there is a sense in the air of that pause that comes after frenetic work to get a project completed by deadline, that moment of relief that it is now done and the opportunity to take a moment to breathe and enjoy the sense of completion. There is satisfaction in the air but also a kind of melancholy, knowing that spring has gone and summer is nearing its end, the days still have the upper hand but they are now perceptibly giving way to the nights.

But the year is not yet done with colour and fragrance and song. Still rosebay willowherb, knapweed and tufted vetch are abundant in the ditches, the set-aside is full of speedwell and scarlet pimpernel and butterflies still flit from flower to flower. But this not just a tale of…

One man and his dog - and the healing power of nature

She’s staring intently at the ground, eyes fixed, body rigid, ears up, head slightly cocked to one side, the occasional swish of her tail brushing the dust.
I’m looking back towards our small white fluffy terrier-like dog from further up the farm track, having realised she is out of sight - she’s usually well ahead of me, jumping through hedges or grass, or nose hoovering up smells along the path or verges. But not this time. Something has grabbed her attention, and held it, so I wander back slowly to have a look. She doesn’t move. I peer at the spot that seems to have her transfixed. Nothing. What is she staring at? I peer closer and there, hidden beneath the early blades of grass is a tiny, wiggling, furry red bottom poking out of a hole in the earth. It’s our first bee of the year. We both stay watching, transfixed by this miracle of nature - tiny and magnificent.


And this experience sums up the nature (excuse the pun) of the following weeks and months as I use this sudden gift of re…

The Power of Small

I've always said, whenever asked, that environmentalism is more about saving people than the planet; the planet is perfectly capable of looking after herself. The Earth has gone through many transformations over her lifecycle and will continue to do so into the future. Whether that future includes humans is, in part, up to us, and in part dependent upon cosmic forces beyond our control (whatever we do, a meteor strike would wipe us all out anyway).  In political circles and the media, there seems to be little interest in the environment. And, frankly, in a capitalist society, until saving the planet makes money, business is not going to be that interested either. And yet, much has been achieved. Renewable electricity generation has increased dramatically in recent years, recycling has gone up, the number of plastic bags going into landfill has fallen. Environmental issues are taught at schools - especially at primary school level. The government's attempt to sell Britain'…